---
title: "Karnataka High Court on inclusion of contract labour in computing the strength of workmen"
date: 2026-07-27
author: "King Stubb &amp; Kasiva"
url: https://ksandk.com/newsletter/contract-labour-workmen-strength-section-25k/
---

# Karnataka High Court on inclusion of contract labour in computing the strength of workmen

Posted On - 27 July, 2026 • By - King Stubb & Kasiva

In the case of *Workmen of Karnataka Malladi Biotics Ltd. v. Karnataka Malladi Biotics Ltd*, *(2026 SCC OnLine Kar 4017)* (*Karnataka High Court, 03rd June, 2026*), the Division Bench addressed whether contract labourers and security guards should be counted as “workmen” for the purposes of **Section 25K** of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The ruling reversed earlier findings and held that the establishment employed over 100 workmen, thereby attracting Chapter V-B.

## Background of the Dispute

The respondent-establishment **laid off and subsequently retrenched 84 workmen** in 2009. The affected workmen challenged the action, contending that the establishment’s total workforce crossed the 100-worker threshold prescribed under Chapter V-B (Sections 25M and 25N) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

## Findings of the Industrial Tribunal and Single Judge

The Industrial Tribunal and the learned Single Judge dismissed the workmen’s claims. They held that the respondent employed only **92 “regular” workmen** and excluded certain categories from the computation under Section 25K.

Specifically, the lower forums reasoned as follows:

- **17 security guards** were excluded on the ground that they did not fall within the definition of “workmen” under Section 2(s).
- **28 contract labourers** were similarly excluded from the computation under Section 25K.
- With these exclusions, the total fell below the 100-worker threshold required for attracting Chapter V-B (Sections 25M and 25N).

## Division Bench Ruling on Workman Status

The Division Bench reversed these findings. It held that **Section 2(s) does not condition workman status upon permanency of employment**.

The Bench established the following key principles:

- Any person engaged for hire or reward under the **supervision and control of the employer** qualifies as a workman.
- This status applies regardless of whether the tenure is contractual or casual.
- Security guards and contract labourers therefore ought to have been included in the computation under Section 25K.

## Adverse Inference for Withholding Evidence

Additionally, the Bench invoked **Section 114, Illustration (g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872**. It drew an adverse inference against the management for wilfully withholding muster rolls and attendance registers despite a Tribunal direction.

The Court held that the **withheld evidence would have been unfavourable to the management**, further supporting the conclusion that the workforce exceeded the statutory threshold.

## Outcome: Chapter V-B Held Applicable

Consequently, the establishment was found to have employed **over 100 workmen**, attracting Chapter V-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The lay-off and retrenchment of the 84 workmen were therefore subject to the prior-permission requirements under Sections 25M and 25N.

*Last Updated on 27 July, 2026*

Get King Stubb & Kasiva’s legal updates in your Google feed[![Add King Stubb & Kasiva as a preferred source on Google](https://ksandk.com/wp-content/uploads/google_preferred_source_badge_light_en@2x.png)](https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=https://ksandk.com/)

---

## Office Locations                                                                                                                                                     
                                               
  - [New Delhi](https://ksandk.com/locations/top-corporate-law-firm-in-delhi/) (HQ): +91-11-41318190 | info@ksandk.com                                                    
  - [Mumbai](https://ksandk.com/locations/top-corporate-law-firm-in-mumbai/): 3 offices (Nariman Point, Lower Parel, Andheri) | mumbai@ksandk.com
  - [Bangalore](https://ksandk.com/locations/top-corporate-law-firm-in-bangalore/): bangalore@ksandk.com                                                                  
  - [Chennai](https://ksandk.com/locations/chennai/): chennai@ksandk.com                                                                                                  
  - [Hyderabad](https://ksandk.com/locations/hyderabad/): hyderabad@ksandk.com                                                                                            
  - [Pune](https://ksandk.com/locations/pune/): pune@ksandk.com                                                                                                           
  - [Kochi](https://ksandk.com/locations/kochi/): kochi@ksandk.com
                                                                                                                                                                          
  ## Contact                                   
                                                                                                                                                                          
  - [Contact Page](https://ksandk.com/contact-us/)
  - General: info@ksandk.com | +91-11-41318190
  - WhatsApp: +91-7428567444
  - [Privacy Statement](https://ksandk.com/privacy-statement/)                                                                                                            
  - [Terms of Use](https://ksandk.com/terms-of-use/)