CCI’s Order Against Meta: Understanding Abuse Of Dominant Position

Posted On - 2 December, 2024 • By - Vatsal Gaur

Introduction

The recent penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on Meta highlights the critical issue of abuse of dominant position in the digital ecosystem.[1] Meta’s 2021 privacy policy update for WhatsApp, which mandated user data sharing across its platforms, raised concerns over anti-competitive practices and consumer harm. This case provides a detailed examination of how dominance in one market can be leveraged to consolidate power in another, adversely affecting competition and user choice. By addressing these practices, the CCI has reinforced the importance of fair competition and transparency in India’s growing digital landscape.

Background on Abuse of Dominant Position

Understanding Dominance and Abuse

  • Dominant position refers to an enterprise’s superior market strength that allows it to operate independently of competitive forces or influence the market in its favor.
  • Dominance itself is not anti-competitive; however, its abuse disrupts fair competition, exploits consumers, and creates entry barriers for competitors.
  • Common practices constituting abuse include:
    • Imposing unfair conditions or pricing (including predatory pricing).
    • Limiting production, markets, or technical development.
    • Denying market access.
    • Applying discriminatory conditions.
    • Leveraging dominance in a market to obtain advantages in another market.
  • Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 prohibits the abuse of dominant position.
  • The provision was enforced on May 20, 2009, after amendments in 2007 extended its applicability to groups of enterprises.
  • The Act emphasizes the impact of abuse rather than dominance itself.

Determining Dominance

  • Dominance is assessed based on the ability to operate independently of competitors and influence the market.
  • The relevant market is determined through two dimensions:
    • Relevant Product Market: Includes substitute goods/services available to consumers.
    • Relevant Geographic Market: Defined by factors like transportation costs, shipment patterns, and trade barriers.

Key Factors for Assessing Dominance

Section 19(4) lists 13 factors to determine dominance, including:

  • Market share, size, and resources of the enterprise.
  • Competitors’ size and economic power.
  • Entry barriers (e.g., regulatory, technical, or financial).
  • Dependence of consumers and countervailing buying power.

Consequences of Abuse

Under Section 27 of the Competition Act, CCI can:

  • Direct enterprises to cease abusive practices.
  • Impose penalties up to 10% of the average turnover for the preceding three financial years.
  • Order structural remedies including dividing the enterprise to prevent future abuse.

Meta’s Privacy Policy Update and CCI’s Findings

Background of the Policy Update

  • In January 2021, WhatsApp, owned by Meta, introduced an updated privacy policy.
  • The update required users to accept new terms, including expanded data collection and mandatory data sharing with Meta companies, to continue using the app.
  • This change removed the opt-out option previously available under the 2016 privacy policy, effectively implementing a “take-it-or-leave-it” policy.

Relevant Markets Defined by CCI

CCI identified two relevant markets for the investigation:

  • The market for OTT messaging apps through smartphones in India, where WhatsApp holds a dominant position.
  • The market for online display advertising in India, where Meta operates as a leading competitor.

CCI’s Key Findings on Abuse of Dominant Position

  • Imposition of Unfair Conditions (Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Competition Act):
    • The mandatory acceptance of the updated privacy policy constituted an imposition of unfair terms.
    • The “take-it-or-leave-it” approach denied users the ability to opt-out, thereby undermining their autonomy.
    • The lack of effective alternatives and WhatsApp’s dominance in the market compelled users to accept the terms to continue using the service.
  • Creation of Entry Barriers and Denial of Market Access (Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act):
    • Sharing WhatsApp users’ data among Meta companies for purposes beyond WhatsApp services created entry barriers for competitors.
    • This led to the denial of market access to competitors in the online display advertising market.
  • Leveraging Dominant Position (Section 4(2)(e) of the Competition Act):
    • Meta leveraged its dominance in the OTT messaging apps market to bolster its position in the online display advertising market.
    • The interconnected data-sharing practices among Meta companies reinforced Meta’s stronghold in the advertising market, to the detriment of competitors.

Anti-Competitive Practices and Consumer Harm

  • The update forced users to share data across Meta platforms, reducing user choice and autonomy.
  • Network effects and the absence of viable alternatives compounded the anti-competitive impact.

CCI’s Order and Implications

Penalty Imposed on Meta

  • CCI imposed a penalty of ₹213.14 crore on Meta for abusing its dominant position in relation to WhatsApp’s 2021 Privacy Policy.
  • The penalty addressed the anti-competitive harm caused by WhatsApp’s practices, particularly the mandatory data-sharing requirement without user consent.

Cease-and-Desist Directions

  • Meta and WhatsApp were directed to cease their anti-competitive practices immediately.
  • Behavioral remedies were prescribed to rectify the harm caused and prevent its recurrence.

Key Directives Issued by the CCI

  • Prohibition of Data Sharing for Advertising (Five-Year Restriction):
    • WhatsApp is prohibited from sharing user data collected on its platform with other Meta companies or Meta company products for advertising purposes for five years.
    • After the five-year period, the restrictions outlined in the order (except specific provisions) will continue to apply to such data sharing.
  • Transparency in Data Sharing for Non-Advertising Purposes: WhatsApp must provide a detailed explanation in its policy regarding the data shared with other Meta companies or Meta products, clearly linking each type of data to its specific purpose.
  • Non-Conditional Access to WhatsApp Services: Sharing of user data collected on WhatsApp for purposes other than providing WhatsApp services shall not be made a precondition for users to access the platform in India.
  • Choice for Users Regarding Data Sharing:
    • WhatsApp has to provide all users in India, including those who accepted the 2021 update, with:
    • An opt-out option to manage data sharing for purposes other than WhatsApp services, accessible through a prominent in-app notification.
    • An option to review and modify their data-sharing preferences through a dedicated and easily accessible tab in the app settings.
  • Compliance for Future Policy Updates: All future updates to WhatsApp’s privacy policy must adhere to these directives, ensuring compliance with the principles of user choice and transparency.

Implications of the CCI Order

  • Impact on Meta’s Business Practices:
    • The restrictions on data sharing for advertising purposes disrupt Meta’s business model, which heavily relies on data integration across platforms.
    • The mandatory opt-out option ensures that Meta cannot unilaterally impose terms that exploit its dominance in the messaging and advertising markets.
  • Strengthening Consumer Rights:
    • Users regain control over their data, promoting autonomy and informed decision-making.
    • The directives emphasize transparency and choice, addressing concerns about unfair terms in digital services.
  • Market Impact:
    • By restricting data sharing, the CCI’s order lowers entry barriers, fostering competition in the online display advertising market.
    • The move signals regulatory intent to curb anti-competitive practices in the digital ecosystem, potentially influencing other dominant players.
  • Compliance Burden on Meta:
    • Meta must overhaul its data-sharing mechanisms and update its policies to comply with the CCI’s directives.
    • Implementation of the new measures, including the in-app notification system and opt-out features, imposes operational challenges.
  • Precedent for Regulatory Action:
    • The order sets a significant precedent for regulating data-sharing practices in India.
    • It underscores the need for fairness and accountability in the intersection of competition law and data privacy.

Broader Implications for the Digital Ecosystem in India

  • The order emphasizes the importance of balancing innovation with consumer protection.
  • It sends a clear message that dominant digital players must prioritize transparency and user choice while formulating policies.
  • The decision could prompt global technology companies to adopt similar measures proactively to avoid regulatory scrutiny.

Conclusion

The CCI’s order against Meta highlights the importance of fair competition and protecting consumer rights in the digital age. By restricting Meta’s data-sharing practices, the decision ensures greater transparency and empowers users to make informed choices about their data. It sends a clear message to dominant companies that market power must not be misused to harm competition or consumers. This ruling is expected to encourage businesses to adopt fairer practices and could shape the way data privacy and competition laws are applied in the future, setting a new standard for accountability in India’s digital economy.

[1] https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2074431

King Stubb & Kasiva,
Advocates & Attorneys

Click Here to Get in Touch

New Delhi | Mumbai | Bangalore | Chennai | Hyderabad | Mangalore | Pune | Kochi
Tel: +91 11 41032969 | Email: info@ksandk.com